Share Your Funny Pictures With Your Friends, Family and The World!
Isengrim

Messages between Isengrim and rhokit

By rhokit on Jan 22, 2011 at 7:40 PM

I've been meaning to ask if you're still associated with "Neopets". Are you??

By Isengrim on Mar 3, 2009 at 9:57 PM

Hehehe. Sorry about the slow reply, been working on the next project. Yeah, I couldn't resist throwing in a mention of the poor Lolrus' plight. It only required a bit of an extension of the monologue I had already written for that scene; as a mention I knew it would be caught by Cheezheads, and shrugged off by others who don't get it (or maybe they'll chuckle, even if they don't know the ref.) It would have been too incongruous to actually depict, though. And yeah, I'm still hooked up with Paypal. Never had a problem with them yet, for what I use it.

By rhokit on Feb 25, 2009 at 8:04 PM

Caught your latest character/storyline. Life is rough for a porky counselor!! A little free publicity for Lols? (deh bukkit) Are you still hhoked up with Paypal?

By Isengrim on Dec 31, 2008 at 5:06 PM

A safe and Happy New Year to you and yours, Rhokit! http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=2998837

By rhokit on Dec 25, 2008 at 6:35 PM

tnx!! seim 2 uze!!

By Isengrim on Dec 24, 2008 at 10:41 PM

Merry Christmas! http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=2962737 http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=2864094

By rhokit on Dec 21, 2008 at 12:05 PM

gud luk! haepeh & mereh 2 uze & yrz!

By Isengrim on Dec 21, 2008 at 8:32 AM

Yes, but they created something that's still awesom 50 years or more on. Checked out Artvoice; I'll drop 'em a line later on.

By rhokit on Dec 20, 2008 at 7:44 PM

f--d up where? The Jack warner story is delicious...the mice will play when the cat's as dense as Jack. Ok, I won't ask to purchase. And yes, I do get your point about the little kids. We do have a local weekly tabloid, Artvoice, in Buffalo that might be interested in giving you space. It's our lefty publication and takes on all sorts of un-and-semi-popular causes. You can Google it if the spirit moves you. Thanks for taking the time to explain to me!!

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 8:56 PM

Crud. I really f-ed up there.

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 8:55 PM

e Jack Warner knew nothing at all about cartoons. He didn't give a rat's ass what the cartoon short division was doing, as long as it made him money. At one point, he thought he owned Mickey Mouse, and had to be corrected. The animators and Mel Blanc got together about the voice of Sylvester the Cat. It's a direct imitation of Jack Warner's actual voice. He was TOLD that it was in imitation of him, and he replied (sounding exactly like Sylvester the Cat), "I don't pshound like ptthat!" Anyway, the point is, the animation team was free to do whatever the hell it wanted to. They wrote and animated their stuff without ANY audience, child or otherwise, in mind. They did what they found amusing. They'd throw ideas around, and if they thought it was funny, that's what they did. I've been doing basically the same thing; its' only recently (since I came here, really!) that it's getting any public feedback. I wasn't at all discouraged when I got rejected by every mewspaper syndicat

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 8:55 PM

Thanks. Glad you understand. I wasn't brushing off your idea or anything, but things just have to fit. And I STRONGLY dislike the idea of adding youngsters of any type, because, to many minds, it would associate it with a "kid-friendly" thing, which it is most definitely not intended to be. Iv'e had a problem with that as it is; I had what you see on the website in newspaper format bound into 100 booklets at a vanity publisher (NO. I only have a handful of copies left, and I need to keep those as backup, so they're not for sale any longer) and sold them at the farmer's market (I gave away more than I sold, probably.) As it was close to Christmas, people would say they wanted to buy it for such and such a kid relative, and I would have to warn them that the average kid probably would neither like nor understand it. You've seen Bugs Bunny and all those old Warner Bros cartoon shorts, right? Think they're funny? Do you know why? Because Jack Warner knew nothing at all about ca

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 8:55 PM

Thanks. Glad you understand. I wasn't brushing off your idea or anything, but things just have to fit. And I STRONGLY dislike the idea of adding youngsters of any type, because, to many minds, it would associate it with a "kid-friendly" thing, which it is most definitely not intended to be. Iv'e had a problem with that as it is; I had what you see on the website in newspaper format bound into 100 booklets at a vanity publisher (NO. I only have a handful of copies left, and I need to keep those as backup, so they're not for sale any longer) and sold them at the farmer's market (I gave away more than I sold, probably.) As it was close to Christmas, people would say they wanted to buy it for such and such a kid relative, and I would have to warn them that the average kid probably would neither like nor understand it. You've seen Bugs Bunny and all those old Warner Bros cartoon shorts, right? Think they're funny? Do you know why? Because Jack Warner knew nothing at all about ca

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 8:52 PM

Thanks. Glad you understand. I wasn't brushing off your idea or anything, but things just have to fit. And I STRONGLY dislike the idea of adding youngsters of any type, because, to many minds, it would associate it with a "kid-friendly" thing, which it is most definitely not intended to be. Iv'e had a problem with that as it is; I had what you see on the website in newspaper format bound into 100 booklets at a vanity publisher (NO. I only have a handful of copies left, and I need to keep those as backup, so they're not for sale any longer) and sold them at the farmer's market (I gave away more than I sold, probably.) As it was close to Christmas, people would say they wanted to buy it for such and such a kid relative, and I would have to warn them that the average kid probably would neither like nor understand it. You've seen Bugs Bunny and all those old Warner Bros cartoon shorts, right? Think they're funny? Do you know why? Because Jack Warner knew nothing at all about ca

By rhokit on Dec 19, 2008 at 7:13 PM

Thanks for explaining all--I had thought about introducing a little girl/boy human close enough to the wild to intuit some of the animals' problems, but I get your point. I love the concept and the critters!!

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 12:32 AM

Oh, on second thought, I remember I restructured the site. I'll see if I can dig up the e-mail you sent before, and attach it for you - it's a Sunday-format strip.

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 12:30 AM

do throw away.) See "Tobit's Amulet" which explains where he got the stupid thing and why he wears it. Keep in mind each character is also an archetype, and sometimes two rolled into one because of the real people I based them on (the fox is the best example). Except for the wolves, which represent my own yin and yang.

By Isengrim on Dec 19, 2008 at 12:24 AM

:) Thank you .. and no throwing up. Prob is, the "world" the characters live in has certain rules. 1. No hoomins. (Can't draw 'em without making them look like monkeys in jeans and t-shirts.) They may be implied, or speak off-camera, but never appear. Think Charles Schultz with grown-ups. 2. While the animals can read and understand spoken English (as through radio and TV) the understanding is only one-way. The concept is that of an emergent culture, starting from nothing, but surrounded by an alien culture which may intrude from time to time, and which is NOT understood properly (and sometimes grossly misinterpreted) and considered to be "of the devil" (Tobit's POV). I make make fast and loose references to things that they really shouldn't know about, but those tend to be restricted to Lepton the fox. Things are pretty flexible (except for no hoomins rule) .. any human artifact they get may be assumed to be scavenged from garbage bins (you'd be surprised what people really

By rhokit on Dec 19, 2008 at 12:05 AM

ok--non-lolspeak. Scene: Alberta; Personae: bureaucrats, big-bucks hunter, dipshit grad student, good folks, wolves &Co. Scenario: essentialyy what you have the wolves "confess"--except from a "human" point-of-view intercut with the animals poiint-of view with the "humans" of course losing out to a gradually-enlightened populace. (feel free to frow up!!)

By Isengrim on Dec 18, 2008 at 11:49 PM

Hey there, where ya been hiding? :) Still working on the next vid ... and I'm always open to ideas. No such thing as intrusion!

By rhokit on Dec 18, 2008 at 11:38 PM

ohai!!wii han tawkt in uh lonk tiem. haowz deh kartunin goin? hev u evuh tawt uv x-pandink deh strip pulitkleh? ai haz sum plawt ideerz if yr inerestd. don wanna introod doh...

By rhokit on Nov 12, 2008 at 5:18 PM

Holy kittehs!! I went to the Darwin webpage and watched the video--only once. My God, that's heavy-duty work--perhaps a little Walt Kelly-esque...not really. In any case IT DOESN'T SUCK!! I've got the site on Favorites. I'm truly impressed.

By rhokit on Nov 12, 2008 at 5:14 PM

Holy kittehs!! I went to the Darwin webpage and watched the video--only once. My God, that's heavy-duty work--perhaps a little Walt Kelly-esque...not really. In any case IT DOESN'T SUCK!! I've got the site on Favorites. I'm truly impressed.

By rhokit on Nov 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM

mai kittehs wunt 2 no if u liek hairreh pawtr--bcus yr kitteh neimz sownd pawtr-ish.

By Isengrim on Nov 11, 2008 at 7:10 PM

Thanks. :) Hope you enjoy it. Oh, the first two of my lolz are two of my own kittehs. Snape cat and Weasly cat have been with us for ages. :) The other three are Weasley's babies. All with, of course, ginger hair. ;)

By rhokit on Nov 10, 2008 at 9:21 PM

tnx 4 fren ofur!! uze gotz lotsa kittehs.aiz gunna go 2 yr sait 2 c yr cartoonz. otta b funz!! aiz shur u don' suk!!noeboddi wif husbin & kittehs kood eva suk!!